International Western Union
You aren't logged in. For some members, you must be logged in to see special sections. Log in to view them, as this message will soon get annoying.

Intelligence Group

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Intelligence Group

Post by GROSS Independency on August 17th 2013, 12:12 am

This topic is dedicated to the discussion of the intelligence group.
avatar
GROSS Independency

Posts : 218
Join date : 2012-09-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by GROSS Independency on October 1st 2013, 6:45 pm

I think we should keep the intelligence group pretty much the same as is, or perhaps get rid of it. An intelligence team is a nice asset to have, but nobody ever dos anything within it. If we could devise a way to ensure more activity, maybe it would work better. Thoughts?
avatar
GROSS Independency

Posts : 218
Join date : 2012-09-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by Vizindolf on October 1st 2013, 10:31 pm

Personally, I see little purpose for it. It may be easier to simply dissolve the position.
avatar
Vizindolf
IWU Consuls
IWU Consuls

Posts : 190
Join date : 2012-10-24

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by GROSS Independency on October 2nd 2013, 12:34 am

I agree, unless someone comes up with a useful way to keep it functional. In the INU, most of the members hope to make a sort of defense organization (the anti-raiding type of defense); perhaps, if the IWU wishes to contribute, the intelligence team could become useful for that. Again, though, I agree with you, Vizindolf.
avatar
GROSS Independency

Posts : 218
Join date : 2012-09-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by Gatito on October 2nd 2013, 6:40 pm

I think that we should keep it, but make its activity minimal, unless we get something cataclysmic on our hands.
avatar
Gatito

Posts : 93
Join date : 2013-07-15
Age : 102

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by GROSS Independency on October 4th 2013, 12:31 pm

Since we have no other ideas, then, we'll have to proceed to a vote.

Vote Options:
1. The Intelligence Group will be abolished due to inactivity and lack of use.
2. The Intelligence Group will assume minimal activity until an emergency occurs.

If anyone else has further ideas, please post them and they will become options themselves.
avatar
GROSS Independency

Posts : 218
Join date : 2012-09-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by GROSS Independency on October 4th 2013, 5:28 pm

I vote option 1. If we do eventually find a need for it, we can re-establish the position. Until then, it's a waste of time.
avatar
GROSS Independency

Posts : 218
Join date : 2012-09-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by Gatito on October 4th 2013, 7:36 pm

2, because it would not be a waste of time if it was at minimal (like VERY minimal) activity during the time of not using it.
avatar
Gatito

Posts : 93
Join date : 2013-07-15
Age : 102

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by Vizindolf on October 5th 2013, 12:24 am

Option 1.
avatar
Vizindolf
IWU Consuls
IWU Consuls

Posts : 190
Join date : 2012-10-24

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by Guest on October 6th 2013, 12:51 am

I say Option 2. Somebody may want to be on it. Might as well let them, even if they job doesn't do much.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by Qora on October 7th 2013, 2:47 pm

I say option 2 as well. Better to have a pointless position you don't need now then try making one when its' too late.
avatar
Qora

Posts : 49
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 26
Location : America, Terra, System Solar, Way of the Milk Galaxy

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by Solaray on October 7th 2013, 2:49 pm

Alrighty, now that this is working, I'd have to vote option 1. I'm all for getting rid of unnecessary sectors of government.
avatar
Solaray

Posts : 7
Join date : 2013-08-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by Gatito on October 7th 2013, 6:20 pm

Okay, so now we're back to square one. Should I call in Otitag to be the tie breaker?
avatar
Gatito

Posts : 93
Join date : 2013-07-15
Age : 102

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by GROSS Independency on October 7th 2013, 7:47 pm

No, we need to have an individual person. However, perhaps I can sway the minds of those who voted for option 2.

The way I see this, if things work out, this is only the abolishing of the intelligence team of the IWU. Virtually everyone in the INU wants the region to become a defender, and this idea has gained support in the ISU and IAU. The more complex plan that is primarily supported is that alongside the interregional government that will (hopefully) be formed with the INU, ISU, IAU and IWU, there will be an interregional defense organization as well (essentially meaning all four regions would be defenders, but working as one). When the time comes, I will be presenting my very thorough plan for this to the IWU, as it is the critical region for the idea's success. Provided the IWU decides to support the defense organization, there will be a great need for intelligence teams, as defenders need to infiltrate raiding regions to become knowledgeable of upcoming attacks. If we abolish the IWU's intelligence team, it will leave us more people to work in intelligence for the defense organization, which will have a more round-the-clock need for them.
avatar
GROSS Independency

Posts : 218
Join date : 2012-09-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by Gatito on October 7th 2013, 8:19 pm

Not convening enough.

In case you want it, Otitag says he desires the abolition of the IWU government, the annexation of the ISU, INU and IAU, and to crown him as the supreme ruler of the newly named International Grasshopper Union, the most feared raider region in all on Nationstates.
avatar
Gatito

Posts : 93
Join date : 2013-07-15
Age : 102

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by GROSS Independency on October 7th 2013, 10:38 pm

That sounds great, Gatito. The IGU. Rather... unusual?

@Everyone: It really is pointless to sit here and wait for the tie to be broken--as a result, we'll go ahead and start the next topic while we wait for a tiebreaker vote.
avatar
GROSS Independency

Posts : 218
Join date : 2012-09-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by Guest on October 8th 2013, 10:25 pm

Ah, why not. I guess you have a point. Since we will be adding more positions in the government due to interregional stuff, we may as well get rid of the Intelligence Group. I guess people operate their own intelligence missions when they want to, anyway, so the position isn't completely necessary. I'll go ahead and change my vote. Let's move on.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by GROSS Independency on October 9th 2013, 12:39 am

That, then, will conclude this.
avatar
GROSS Independency

Posts : 218
Join date : 2012-09-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Intelligence Group

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum